Thursday, January 31, 2008

Democratic Debate

Very civil. They wanted to provide their subtle differences on the issues, and contrast them with the Republicans'. Team-building exercise. Most enthusiastic question was near the end about a Clinton-Obama or Obama-Clinton ticket. Not close to the hostility of some of the previous debates.

Obama came out looking stronger than Clinton on Iraq, but only on the past. Their foreign policy for the future is essentially the same. We'll see if this debate makes a big difference on Tuesday, but I doubt it will.

I wonder if all the attacks and violent banter came from Edwards? Without him, very civil. With him, bark bark.

Edwards....

Monday, January 28, 2008

State of the Union

Maybe I'm crazy, but I don't think Bush is that bad.

Not that he's good.

Sunday, January 27, 2008

SC

Most people were predicting an Obama win, but by that much!? He doubled up Hillary.

Momentum heading into February 5th, but it's looking as if Super Tuesday is as likely to leave things confused as it is to provide a front-runner.

---
Emily Hughes missed the US Championships. Oh well. And Kimmie Meissner disappointed.

Super Bowl in a week.

Thursday, January 24, 2008

Republicans Debate

A very interesting debate. I think Romney won; he's leading in the Florida polls and I suppose he'll win there. Just like with the Dems Super Tuesday is huge. They seemed to agree that Hillary will be the Democratic nominee; I don't think they mentioned Obama's name once. They also played nicer than the Democrats; they didn't attack each other nearly as much. Tim Russert blasted the Bush administration, citing rises in unemployment, the deficit, debt, and gas prices. Some of the statistics were quite remarkable; I think he said gas was $1.47 in 2001. That might not be right, but I think it's close. Anyways, my thoughts about each candidate.

Mitt Romney:
Romney looked and sounded sharp. He articulated his positions well and came out looking really strong economically. It appeared that he's the most economically savvy. He defended himself well from questions about his campaign spending and his Mormon faith. He didn't appear as strong as the others on foreign policy though. He wanted people to focus on his record as Massachusetts governor and as him being a Washington outsider.

John McCain:
I remember an SNL skit from the 2004 campaign where John Kerry listed all the people he knew. McCain did that tonight. He knows a lot of people. I didn't know any of them, and I'm guessing a lot of Floridian Republicans don't either. Opposite to Romney, he looked strong on foreign policy and weak on the economy. He forcefully confirmed his views on Iraq, saying that if we "surrendered," as in Hillary's plan, then al-Qaeda would win. A little bit of demagoguery.

Rudy Giuliani:
Giuliani wandered a lot and I don't think he really helped his chances. The thing I felt that set him apart was how he felt on environmental innovation. He wanted to improve technology rather than set emissions caps. And he took a larger world view of the problem of global warming, which I think is essential.

Ron Paul:
He got asked about 3 or 4 questions, but did his best. He continues to get marginalized. He is the only Republican against the war, which drew strong applause from the audience. His big thing is his difference from the others. Also he wore an '80s style tie which looked goofy. At the end he criticized the Republican Party for losing their Republican values.

Mike Huckabee:
He was also marginalized. I think people believe he'll get out of the race soon; he needs a big Super Tuesday. Losing South Carolina hurt him. He wandered on a lot of questions too. He wants to add to the highways to invigorate the economy. Hm. His Fair Tax plan is garbage, and unrealistic, as Russert pointed out. He did, however, have the best jokes.

This looks to be shaping up to be a Romney-McCain race. That would be the best ticket for the Republicans, regardless of which one they pick as President. It combines the economic expert and the foreign policy expert. They spent a lot of time blasting Hillary. I admit myself very surprised at the lack of an Obama mention. I predict Romney wins the nomination.

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Down Goes Frazier

Not actually a boxing match, but certainly they went to the debate "looking for a fight." The problem is that slinging mud at each other helps no one but yourself and doesn't foster party unity, which is an essential aspect of political success. I support Clinton, but I like Obama too!!! If I could sit down with the both of them I'd tell them to lay off each other. But of course they wouldn't listen to me.

Edwards struggled to get into the banter last night, complaining that there was a third person in the debate. Hey, what about our friend Congressman Kucinich? I bet he'd love to be there too. Not only was his invitation to the last debate rescinded, but when he sued to be included, the network appealed and had the decision overturned. How long can Edwards maintain he is right up there in the race when he gets 4% in Nevada and is far behind in his home state? He'll probably be gone after Feb. 5.

Speaking of candidates leaving the race, Fred Thompson ended his bid today. My friend Mr Vargas pointed this out in his blog on Sunday.

Monday, January 21, 2008

Conference Championships

Well, the Super Bowl is all set. A rematch of one of the best regular season games of the year, the NFL is certainly very pleased with the matchup. You have the undefeated New England Patriots, the most hated team in recent memory, and the New York Giants, playing in a huge market. Great ratings!

Thoughts from the weekend:

New England-San Diego
As I thought, it turned out to be a close game. The Chargers were pretty banged up, and they should be commended for a fantastic finish to their season after starting out 5-5. Maybe Norv Turner is the right guy to get this talented team to the promised land. LT didn't do much to add to his legacy, not playing the whole game. One thing that made me angry was when one of the Chargers, I think Cromartie, got an interception and then did Moss' weird little celebration. After LT ripped NE for doing Merriman's "Lights Out" dance last year, I guarantee that he won't go after his guy. But whatever. New England didn't play well, but they still were able to beat a very good SD team. They should be just fine against NY.

New York-Green Bay
A great game that GB gave away. Favre reverted to his pre-2007 bad Brett, throwing horrendous interceptions. I don't think they ran the ball as much as they should have, Grant was coming off a 200 yard game last week. Favre'll be back next year. Eli played well again, but since he hasn't turned the ball over at all this postseason, he probably has a lot of pent-up turnovers in him. Maybe 4 picks and a fumble? I still don't trust him. Should be a fun Super Bowl though.

Something irrelevant that I just noticed: All four teams in the conference games have two words in their name: New England, New York, Green Bay, San Diego.
WHAT DOES THAT MEAN???

Democratic debate on right now. Stimulus plans!

Saturday, January 19, 2008

Twirling Towards Freedom

Three different winners today. Romney won Nevada, as expected, and McCain edged out Huckabee in South Carolina. Sure looks like McCain has the most momentum right now. But Romney and Huckabee are still right there. Thompson is far out, but there's still a chance he makes a comeback, and Giuliani has always been banking on Florida. Hillary won for the Democrats, which was huge. Obama will probably win South Carolina, so preventing him from getting back-to-back wins was important. Still either candidates' race. Edwards didn't do too well, I think he'll be done after Super Tuesday.

Conference championship games tomorrow. The Predictions:
New England 20, San Diego 17
Green Bay 20, New York 17

Friday, January 18, 2008

Best Father Ever

(After the death of Bleeding Gums Murphy)
Lisa: He was my idol. Why'd he have to die?
Homer: Remember when your cat Snowball was run over?
Lisa: Yeah.
Homer: Well, we can just go to the pound and get a new jazz man.

Thursday, January 17, 2008

My Endorsement

Well, I'm going to endorse a candidate. And I'm then going to vote in the Feb. 5 primary.

As you probably now, I'm very liberal. So to me, the only real options are the Democrats, although I admit I would not be devastated if McCain became our next President. The other Republicans are, unfortunately, unacceptable to me. As much as I do like Mike Huckabee, his positions are just too repulsive.

Anyways, looking at the Demos gives three real options. Kucinich is very interesting and has some very good ideas, but he has no chance at the nomination, and probably wouldn't make an effective President. So, the problem with the other three (Clinton, Obama, and Edwards) is that they are all very, very similar. There is no humongous difference between their positions. So I looked at the other aspects of a candidate.

John Edwards has a fair amount of support, but I don't believe that he can come back. He certainly has the ability, but is still relatively inexperienced, and he's been out of office the last few years.

Barack Obama is certainly a fantastic orator and motivator. He's very bright, but again, is not as experienced as the other candidates. It's a neck and neck race between him and Hillary for the nomination.

Hillary Clinton is my choice for the next President of the United States. She has far and away the most experience, having spent years in the Senate and two terms as First Lady before that. She too is exceptionally smart, and has forged the political connections that are so necessary. Her experience has taught her what it takes to get things done. She can also easily call on the advice of her husband Bill, a luxury not seen before. She may not be the person that "changes" how things are done in Washington, but she is the best choice for the most effective progressive candidate. Last night I bought some stickers from her online store, and on Feb 5 I'm going to punch and/or check the box next to the name Hillary Clinton.

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Lou Dobbs Rips Candidates

Interesting editorial from Lou Dobbs on CNN.com

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/01/15/Dobbs.January16/index.html

He raises valid points about how candidates run in an election, but I don't agree with his pessimism.

Tuesday, January 15, 2008

Michigan and Nevada

Mitt Romney won Michigan. I see him winning the nomination, but we'll see. It is a very interesting primary season, on both sides. There are still 4-5 realistic candidates on the right and 3 on the left. One problem, which was mentioned in tonight's debate, is that the three Democrats all have very similar positions. Based solely on their stances on the issues, they're more or less identical. I think Edwards "won" this debate, but we'll see what the Nevada caucus looks like. He still probably won't catch up, but you never know!

My endorsement coming by the end of the weekend.

Leadup to Super Tuesday

There's a very interesting Democratic debate coming up tonight. Not the least interesting parts being to see whether Obama and Clinton make up and kiss or go back on the assault. It seems that they have a "truce," which is probably a good thing. The problem with attacking members of your own party is that it doesn't lead to anything productive, only the possibility of yourself getting elected. Unfortunately they're both so into this race that it can still go either way, and "attacking" the other may be the best way to help get themselves elected.

Again unfortunately, MSNBC has just excluded Dennis Kucinich from tonight's debate. I don't see the reasoning behind this, unless it's a very cynical one. I find it disappointing.

At the same time, the Michigan Republican primary goes on. I guess it'll be McCain, but we'll see. Another strong finish for Mike Huckabee would be very interesting for his chances, but I don't see him competing. There just aren't enough evangelicals to carry him. It also appears that the biggest issue of today is not Iraq, illegal immigration, or abortion, but the economy. It will be interesting to see who Michigan voters have decided can best help the economy.

Monday, January 14, 2008

Wow, what a great weekend of football. Upsets galore! Some quick thoughts from each game:

Pack-Seahawks
The Packers offense is great. Ryan Grant answered any questions about both his ability to be a playmaker and also about his intestinal fortitude. He had a great game after bouncing back from two early fumbles. He didn’t let those mistakes kill his confidence. Green Bay’s gonna be a tough team to beat. The Seahawks, on the other hand, are overrated. They desperately need to upgrade their wide receivers and running backs in the offseason. Alexander isn’t close to the player he once was. Deion Branch is good, but he’s too injury prone, and even when healthy he’s only a number two. Hasselbeck isn’t good enough to win with no help. He’s not Tom Brady.


Giants-Cowboys
This game was a big letdown from the Cowboys. They played horrendously. All they can do is work hard in the offseason and try again next year. Maybe they could get TO a box of tissues. The Giants played well, but I don’t think they’ll beat Green Bay next week. Eli may have confidence, but that doesn’t mean he’s good. I see Green Bay winning handily.

Bolts-Colts
This is just one of those games that you can’t do much about. The Chargers are now 9-3 all time at the RCA Dome, and have a three-game win streak against the Colts. For whatever reason, they have their number. They got beaten up but were still able to pull out a victory. They’ve been on fire, and I think next week’s game will be a lot closer than people think. As Tony Dungy said in his press conference, the Colts got into scoring position four times but failed to come out with any points. The turnovers were key, and they just couldn’t rebound. They failed to execute on 4th down late, but that happens. If Tony Dungy chooses to retire, I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Colts pursue Josh McDaniels. He would be perfect for that offense.

Jags-Pats
Obviously I’m biased, but the Pats’ offense played great. Brady is moving up the list of all-time great QBs. Here’s my list as of now:

1. 1. John Elway
2. Joe Montana
3. Tom Brady
4. Peyton Manning
5. Brett Favre

If the Pats do go on to win the Super Bowl, I think Brady will eclipse Montana, and maybe Elway as well. Their defense, however, did struggle, especially early. The Chargers have a good offense, even though Philip Rivers sucks. I think this game will be close, and I’m eagerly anticipating it.

Friday, January 11, 2008

First Post

Hey, I'm Mike.

I'll be posting whenever, about whatever, mostly politics and sports I assume. We'll see where it goes.